# Bobcat 1.3 (31B) vs Bobcat Flash 1.2 (Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it + two merged rank-64 LoRA adapters, typed-decision readout at the first answer position, FP8, self-hosted)

As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads Bobcat Flash 1.2 (Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it + two merged rank-64 LoRA adapters, typed-decision readout at the first answer position, FP8, self-hosted) in 1 of 1 shared categories: Decision models.

Bobcat 1.3 (31B): price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.

Bobcat Flash 1.2 (Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it + two merged rank-64 LoRA adapters, typed-decision readout at the first answer position, FP8, self-hosted): price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.

Bobcat 1.3 (31B): open weights.

Bobcat Flash 1.2 (Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it + two merged rank-64 LoRA adapters, typed-decision readout at the first answer position, FP8, self-hosted): open weights.

- Which to pick, Decision models: As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads Bobcat Flash 1.2 (Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it + two merged rank-64 LoRA adapters, typed-decision readout at the first answer position, FP8, self-hosted) in Decision models at #5 against #23.

As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) is state of the art in Decision models (since Oct 14, 2026; sources Decision Index latency; methodology v1.0).

As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat Flash 1.2 (Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it + two merged rank-64 LoRA adapters, typed-decision readout at the first answer position, FP8, self-hosted) is ranked #23 in Decision models (since Oct 14, 2026; sources JevBench; methodology v1.0).