# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.2

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in 5 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).

Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.

GLM 5.2: $1.7799999999999998 per 1M blended tokens.

Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.

GLM 5.2: open weights.

- Which to pick, General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in General LLM at #5 against #26.
- Which to pick, Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Reasoning at #4 against #30.
- Which to pick, Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #23 against #34.
- Which to pick, Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #23 against #32.
- Which to pick, Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Long context at #4 against #25.
- Which to pick, Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Factuality at #12 against #31.
- Which to pick, Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #29.

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 is near state of the art, rank #4 in Reasoning (since Oct 14, 2026; sources LMArena Text (style-controlled, hard prompts); methodology v1.0).

As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 is a former state-of-the-art holder in Coding › Web dev (since Jun 18, 2026; sources LMArena WebDev; methodology v1.0).