# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.3 Flash in 6 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Vision, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).

Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.

GLM 5.3 Flash: $0.2375 per 1M blended tokens.

Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.

GLM 5.3 Flash: open weights.

- Which to pick, General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.3 Flash in General LLM at #5 against #30.
- Which to pick, Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.3 Flash in Reasoning at #4 against #26.
- Which to pick, Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 and GLM 5.3 Flash share #34 in Science.
- Which to pick, Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.3 Flash leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #22 against #32.
- Which to pick, Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.3 Flash in Long context at #4 against #30.
- Which to pick, Vision: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.3 Flash in Vision at #20 against #29.
- Which to pick, Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.3 Flash in Factuality at #12 against #30.
- Which to pick, Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.3 Flash in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #14.

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 is near state of the art, rank #4 in Reasoning (since Oct 14, 2026; sources LMArena Text (style-controlled, hard prompts); methodology v1.0).

As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.3 Flash is state of the art on best per dollar in Coding (since Oct 14, 2026; sources Terminal-Bench 4.0; methodology v1.0).