# Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 4 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, and Factuality.

Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.

GPT-6.1 Sol: $4.000000000000001 per 1M blended tokens.

Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.

GPT-6.1 Sol: closed weights.

- Which to pick, General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in General LLM at #5 against #18.
- Which to pick, Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in Reasoning at #4 against #15.
- Which to pick, Science: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #4 against #34.
- Which to pick, Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #4 against #34.
- Which to pick, Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in Long context at #4 against #18.
- Which to pick, Vision: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Vision at #1 against #20.
- Which to pick, Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in Factuality at #13 against #33.
- Which to pick, Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Abstraction (ARC) at #1 against #11.

As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 is near state of the art, rank #4 in Reasoning (since Oct 15, 2026; sources LMArena Text (style-controlled, hard prompts); methodology v1.0).

As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol is tied for state of the art in Vision (since Sep 30, 2026; sources GDP.pdf; methodology v1.0).