# Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Luna

As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in 8 of 10 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Vision, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).

Gemini 3.7 Flash: $1.5 per 1M blended tokens.

GPT-5.6 Luna: $0.44999999999999996 per 1M blended tokens.

Gemini 3.7 Flash: closed weights.

GPT-5.6 Luna: closed weights.

- Which to pick, General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in General LLM at #14 against #53.
- Which to pick, Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in Reasoning at #16 against #55.
- Which to pick, Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in Science at #5 against #25.
- Which to pick, Coding: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna leads Gemini 3.7 Flash in Coding at #16 against #20.
- Which to pick, Coding › Agentic: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna leads Gemini 3.7 Flash in Coding › Agentic at #16 against #20.
- Which to pick, Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in Coding › Web dev at #25 against #43.
- Which to pick, Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in Long context at #14 against #65.
- Which to pick, Vision: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in Vision at #14 against #19.
- Which to pick, Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in Factuality at #15 against #35.
- Which to pick, Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash leads GPT-5.6 Luna in Abstraction (ARC) at #6 against #19.

As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.7 Flash is state of the art on best per dollar in Vision (since Oct 14, 2026; sources GDP.pdf; methodology v1.0).

As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna is ranked #16 in Coding (since Oct 14, 2026; sources Terminal-Bench 4.0; methodology v1.0).