Bobcat 1.3 (31B) vs H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim)
As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim) in 1 of 1 shared categories: Decision models.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B)
Yes. Yes on Decision models (same-GPU latency). Not the overall leader.
H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim)
#17 Best current rank: #17 in Decision models, as of Oct 14, 2026.
| Category | Bobcat 1.3 (31B) | H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim) |
|---|---|---|
| Decision models | #5 · Near-SOTA · Decision models Margin 2.424242424242422 Jev Decision Index · Oct 14, 2026 | #17 · #17 in Decision models Margin 7.575757575757578 JevBench · Oct 8, 2026 |
Bobcat 1.3 (31B): price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.
H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim): price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B): open weights.
H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim): open weights.
Decision models: As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim) in Decision models at #5 against #17.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B) · H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim)
Bobcat 1.3 (31B) or H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim)?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim) in 1 of 1 shared categories: Decision models.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B) or H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim) for Decision models?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads H2O-Lightning-4B v1.1 (H2O.ai, Qwen3.5-4B fine-tune, stock vLLM + open shim) in Decision models at #5 against #17.