Bobcat 1.3 (31B) vs Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits)
As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits) in 1 of 1 shared categories: Decision models.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B)
Yes. Yes on Decision models (same-GPU latency). Not the overall leader.
Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits)
#13 Best current rank: #13 in Decision models, as of Oct 14, 2026.
| Category | Bobcat 1.3 (31B) | Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits) |
|---|---|---|
| Decision models | #5 · Near-SOTA · Decision models Margin 2.424242424242422 Jev Decision Index · Oct 14, 2026 | #13 · #13 in Decision models Margin 5.833333333333329 Jev Decision Index · Oct 14, 2026 |
Bobcat 1.3 (31B): price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.
Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits): price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B): open weights.
Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits): open weights.
Decision models: As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits) in Decision models at #5 against #13.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B) · Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits)
Bobcat 1.3 (31B) or Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits)?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits) in 1 of 1 shared categories: Decision models.
Bobcat 1.3 (31B) or Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits) for Decision models?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Bobcat 1.3 (31B) leads Quyet-1.0-Large (Chinh Nguyen, Gemma-4-31B decoder, option-letter logits) in Decision models at #5 against #13.