Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 4 Argon in 2 of 6 shared categories: Coding › Web dev and Vision.
Claude Fable 5.1
Yes. SOTA in Factuality (tied).
Gemini 4 Argon
Yes. SOTA in General LLM, Reasoning (tied), Long context (tied), and Factuality (tied).
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #6 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.191489361702125 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #1 · SOTA · General LLM Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #5 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.191489361702125 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #1 · Co-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #2 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 2.2222222222222285 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | — |
| Science | — | #1 · #1 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 30, 2026 |
| Coding | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #5 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 3.200000000000003 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #8 · #8 in Coding › Web dev Margin 5.599999999999994 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #6 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 3.1914893617021107 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #1 · Co-SOTA · Long context Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #6 · #6 in Vision Margin 18.421052631578945 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | #7 · #7 in Vision Margin 21.05263157894737 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 30, 2026 |
| Factuality | #1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | — |
Claude Fable 5.1: $20 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 4 Argon: $4.000000000000001 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Fable 5.1: closed weights.
Gemini 4 Argon: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Gemini 4 Argon leads Claude Fable 5.1 in General LLM at #1 against #6.
Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Gemini 4 Argon leads Claude Fable 5.1 in Reasoning at #1 against #5.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 4 Argon in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #8.
Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Gemini 4 Argon leads Claude Fable 5.1 in Long context at #1 against #6.
Vision: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 4 Argon in Vision at #6 against #7.
Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 4 Argon share #1 in Factuality.
Claude Fable 5.1 · Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 4 Argon?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 4 Argon in 2 of 6 shared categories: Coding › Web dev and Vision.
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 4 Argon for General LLM?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Gemini 4 Argon leads Claude Fable 5.1 in General LLM at #1 against #6.
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 4 Argon for Reasoning?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Gemini 4 Argon leads Claude Fable 5.1 in Reasoning at #1 against #5.
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 4 Argon for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 4 Argon in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #8.