Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.1 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 0 of 6 shared categories.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #57 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 38.775510204081634 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #18 · #18 in General LLM Margin 12.244897959183675 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #47 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 32.87671232876713 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #15 · #15 in Reasoning Margin 10.958904109589042 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #27 · #27 in Math Margin 57.77777777777778 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 5, 2025 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #83 · #83 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 5, 2025 | #4 · #4 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 5, 2025 | #2 · Near-SOTA · Coding Margin 13.63636363636364 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | — | #2 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 13.63636363636364 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #76 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 70.09345794392523 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #4 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 2.803738317757009 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #44 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 29.931972789115648 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #17 · #17 in Long context Margin 11.564625850340136 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | — | #1 · Co-SOTA · Vision Margin 0 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
| Factuality | #74 · #74 in Factuality Margin 55.97014925373134 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #29 · #29 in Factuality Margin 22.388059701492537 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | — | #1 · #1 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.1: $29.999999999999996 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-6.1 Sol: $4.000000000000001 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.1: closed weights.
GPT-6.1 Sol: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in General LLM at #18 against #57.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Reasoning at #15 against #47.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Science at #4 against #83.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Coding › Web dev at #4 against #76.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Long context at #17 against #44.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Factuality at #29 against #74.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.1 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 0 of 6 shared categories.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6.1 Sol for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in General LLM at #18 against #57.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6.1 Sol for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Reasoning at #15 against #47.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6.1 Sol for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Science at #4 against #83.