Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6 Sol
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.1 leads GPT-6 Sol in 1 of 6 shared categories: Long context.
Claude Opus 4.1
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
GPT-6 Sol
#5 Best current rank: #5 in Coding, as of Oct 14, 2026.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.1 | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #57 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 38.775510204081634 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #43 · #43 in General LLM Margin 29.25170068027211 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #47 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 32.87671232876713 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #39 · #39 in Reasoning Margin 27.397260273972606 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #27 · #27 in Math Margin 57.77777777777778 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 5, 2025 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #83 · #83 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 5, 2025 | #8 · #8 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 5, 2025 | #5 · #5 in Coding Margin 27.272727272727266 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | — | #5 · #5 in Coding › Agentic Margin 27.272727272727266 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #76 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 70.09345794392523 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #7 · #7 in Coding › Web dev Margin 5.607476635514018 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #44 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 29.931972789115648 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #49 · #49 in Long context Margin 33.33333333333333 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | — | #9 · #9 in Vision Margin 26.315789473684205 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Factuality | #74 · #74 in Factuality Margin 55.97014925373134 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #70 · #70 in Factuality Margin 52.985074626865675 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | — | #6 · #6 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.1: $29.999999999999996 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-6 Sol: $4.000000000000001 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.1: closed weights.
GPT-6 Sol: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in General LLM at #43 against #57.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Reasoning at #39 against #47.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Science at #8 against #83.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Coding › Web dev at #7 against #76.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.1 leads GPT-6 Sol in Long context at #44 against #49.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Factuality at #70 against #74.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6 Sol?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.1 leads GPT-6 Sol in 1 of 6 shared categories: Long context.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6 Sol for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in General LLM at #43 against #57.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6 Sol for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Reasoning at #39 against #47.
Claude Opus 4.1 or GPT-6 Sol for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.1 in Science at #8 against #83.