Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.5 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 0 of 7 shared categories.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #33 · #33 in General LLM Margin 22.448979591836732 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #18 · #18 in General LLM Margin 12.244897959183675 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #28 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 19.86301369863014 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #15 · #15 in Reasoning Margin 10.958904109589042 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #16 · #16 in Math Margin 33.33333333333333 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 24, 2025 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #68 · #68 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 24, 2025 | #4 · #4 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 24, 2025 | #2 · Near-SOTA · Coding Margin 13.63636363636364 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | — | #2 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 13.63636363636364 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #53 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 48.598130841121495 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #4 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 2.803738317757009 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #19 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 12.925170068027214 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #17 · #17 in Long context Margin 11.564625850340136 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | — | #1 · Co-SOTA · Vision Margin 0 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
| Factuality | #36 · #36 in Factuality Margin 27.611940298507463 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #29 · #29 in Factuality Margin 22.388059701492537 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #49 · #49 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 24, 2025 | #1 · #1 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.5: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-6.1 Sol: $4.000000000000001 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5: closed weights.
GPT-6.1 Sol: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in General LLM at #18 against #33.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Reasoning at #15 against #28.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Science at #4 against #68.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Coding › Web dev at #4 against #53.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Long context at #17 against #19.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Factuality at #29 against #36.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Abstraction (ARC) at #1 against #49.
Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.5 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 0 of 7 shared categories.
Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in General LLM at #18 against #33.
Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Reasoning at #15 against #28.
Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-6.1 Sol for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.5 in Science at #4 against #68.