Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.7
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in 5 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #2.
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #4 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #2 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 2.0547945205479436 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #11 · #11 in Math Margin 22.22222222222223 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 |
| Science | #32 · #32 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #35 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 31.775700934579433 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #2 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 0.6802721088435391 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 |
| Factuality | #3 · Near-SOTA · Factuality Margin 2.9850746268656536 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | — | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.6: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6: closed weights.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in General LLM at #4 against #5.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Reasoning at #2 against #4.
Math: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Claude Opus 4.6 in Math at #10 against #11.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #32 against #34.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Claude Opus 4.6 in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #35.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Long context at #2 against #4.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Factuality at #3 against #12.
Claude Opus 4.6 · Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.7?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in 5 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.7 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in General LLM at #4 against #5.
Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.7 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Reasoning at #2 against #4.
Claude Opus 4.6 or Claude Opus 4.7 for Math?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Claude Opus 4.6 in Math at #10 against #11.