Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #2.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #4 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #61 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 41.49659863945578 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #2 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 2.0547945205479436 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #73 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 50.68493150684932 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #11 · #11 in Math Margin 22.22222222222223 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #32 · #32 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #58 · #58 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding › Web dev | #35 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 31.775700934579433 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #105 · #105 in Coding › Web dev Margin 97.19626168224299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #2 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 0.6802721088435391 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #58 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 39.455782312925166 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #3 · Near-SOTA · Factuality Margin 2.9850746268656536 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #33 · #33 in Factuality Margin 25.373134328358205 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | — | #48 · #48 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
Claude Opus 4.6: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6: closed weights.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #4 against #61.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #2 against #73.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #32 against #58.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #35 against #105.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Long context at #2 against #58.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Factuality at #3 against #33.
Claude Opus 4.6 · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #4 against #61.
Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #2 against #73.
Claude Opus 4.6 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #32 against #58.