Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #2.
GLM 5
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #4 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #45 · #45 in General LLM Margin 30.612244897959187 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #2 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 2.0547945205479436 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Reasoning Margin 32.1917808219178 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #11 · #11 in Math Margin 22.22222222222223 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #32 · #32 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #35 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 31.775700934579433 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #62 · #62 in Coding › Web dev Margin 57.00934579439252 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #2 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 0.6802721088435391 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Long context Margin 31.972789115646265 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #3 · Near-SOTA · Factuality Margin 2.9850746268656536 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Factuality Margin 35.07462686567165 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | — | #47 · #47 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.6: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5: $0.9299999999999999 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6: closed weights.
GLM 5: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #4 against #45.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #2 against #46.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in Science at #32 against #47.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in Coding › Web dev at #35 against #62.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in Long context at #2 against #47.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in Factuality at #3 against #46.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #4 against #45.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #2 against #46.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5 in Science at #32 against #47.