Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 5.2
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in 4 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #2.
GLM 5.2
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #4 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #26 · #26 in General LLM Margin 17.687074829931973 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #2 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 2.0547945205479436 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #30 · #30 in Reasoning Margin 21.23287671232876 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #11 · #11 in Math Margin 22.22222222222223 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #32 · #32 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | #23 · #23 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 16, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 5, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #35 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 31.775700934579433 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #23 · #23 in Coding › Web dev Margin 20.560747663551396 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #2 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 0.6802721088435391 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #25 · #25 in Long context Margin 17.006802721088434 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #3 · Near-SOTA · Factuality Margin 2.9850746268656536 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #31 · #31 in Factuality Margin 23.88059701492537 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | — | #29 · #29 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 16, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.6: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5.2: $1.7799999999999998 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6: closed weights.
GLM 5.2: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in General LLM at #4 against #26.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in Reasoning at #2 against #30.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.6 in Science at #23 against #32.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.6 in Coding › Web dev at #23 against #35.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in Long context at #2 against #25.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in Factuality at #3 against #31.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5.2?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in 4 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5.2 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in General LLM at #4 against #26.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5.2 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.6 leads GLM 5.2 in Reasoning at #2 against #30.
Claude Opus 4.6 or GLM 5.2 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.6 in Science at #23 against #32.