Compare · 2026-10-14

Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in 5 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.

CategoryClaude Opus 4.7DeepSeek V4 Pro
General LLM
#5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM
Margin 3.401360544217681
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#44 · #44 in General LLM
Margin 29.931972789115648
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Reasoning
#4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning
Margin 3.4246575342465775
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#45 · #45 in Reasoning
Margin 31.506849315068493
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Math
#10 · #10 in Math
Margin 20
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Science
#34 · #34 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
#28 · #28 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 24, 2026
Coding
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 24, 2026
Coding › Web dev
#32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 28.971962616822424
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#57 · #57 in Coding › Web dev
Margin 52.33644859813084
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Long context
#4 · Near-SOTA · Long context
Margin 2.7210884353741562
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#43 · #43 in Long context
Margin 29.25170068027211
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Vision
#20 · Was SOTA · Vision
Margin 55.26315789473684
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
—
Factuality
#12 · #12 in Factuality
Margin 9.701492537313428
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#41 · #41 in Factuality
Margin 31.343283582089555
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Abstraction (ARC)
#11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
—
Price per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.48371999999999993 per 1M blended tokens.

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.

DeepSeek V4 Pro: open weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in General LLM at #5 against #44.

Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Reasoning at #4 against #45.

Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #28 against #34.

Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #57.

Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Long context at #4 against #43.

Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Factuality at #12 against #41.

Claude Opus 4.7 · DeepSeek V4 Pro

Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in 5 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.

Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Pro for General LLM?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in General LLM at #5 against #44.

Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Pro for Reasoning?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Reasoning at #4 against #45.

Claude Opus 4.7 or DeepSeek V4 Pro for Science?

As of Oct 14, 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #28 against #34.