Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 4 26B A4b
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
Gemma 4 26B A4b
Yes. Yes on General LLM (≤32B); Reasoning (≤32B). Not the overall leader.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 4 26B A4b |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #73 · #73 in General LLM Margin 49.65986394557823 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #69 · #69 in Reasoning Margin 47.945205479452056 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #83 · #83 in Coding › Web dev Margin 76.6355140186916 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #74 · #74 in Long context Margin 50.34013605442177 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #60 · #60 in Factuality Margin 45.522388059701484 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemma 4 26B A4b: price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
Gemma 4 26B A4b: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in General LLM at #5 against #73.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in Reasoning at #4 against #69.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #83.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in Long context at #4 against #74.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in Factuality at #12 against #60.
Claude Opus 4.7 · Gemma 4 26B A4b
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 26B A4b?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 26B A4b for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in General LLM at #5 against #73.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 26B A4b for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in Reasoning at #4 against #69.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 26B A4b for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 26B A4b in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #83.