Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemma 4 31B
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
Gemma 4 31B
Yes. Yes on General LLM (≤32B); Reasoning (≤32B). Not the overall leader.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #54 · #54 in General LLM Margin 36.734693877551024 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #50 · #50 in Reasoning Margin 34.93150684931507 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #80 · #80 in Coding › Web dev Margin 73.83177570093457 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #45 · #45 in Long context Margin 30.612244897959187 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #49 · #49 in Factuality Margin 37.3134328358209 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemma 4 31B: price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
Gemma 4 31B: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in General LLM at #5 against #54.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in Reasoning at #4 against #50.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #80.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in Long context at #4 against #45.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in Factuality at #12 against #49.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 31B?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 31B for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in General LLM at #5 against #54.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 31B for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in Reasoning at #4 against #50.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemma 4 31B for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Gemma 4 31B in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #80.