Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 4.6
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GLM 4.6
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #87 · #87 in General LLM Margin 59.183673469387756 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #89 · #89 in Reasoning Margin 61.64383561643836 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #88 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 81.30841121495327 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #90 · #90 in Long context Margin 61.224489795918366 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #55 · #55 in Factuality Margin 41.7910447761194 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 4.6: $0.875 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GLM 4.6: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in General LLM at #5 against #87.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in Reasoning at #4 against #89.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #88.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in Long context at #4 against #90.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in Factuality at #12 against #55.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 4.6?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 4.6 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in General LLM at #5 against #87.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 4.6 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in Reasoning at #4 against #89.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 4.6 for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 4.6 in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #88.