Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GLM 5
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #45 · #45 in General LLM Margin 30.612244897959187 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Reasoning Margin 32.1917808219178 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #62 · #62 in Coding › Web dev Margin 57.00934579439252 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Long context Margin 31.972789115646265 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Factuality Margin 35.07462686567165 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5: $1.55 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GLM 5: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #5 against #45.
Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #4 against #46.
Science: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Science at #34 against #47.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #62.
Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Long context at #4 against #47.
Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Factuality at #12 against #46.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #47.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5 for General LLM?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #5 against #45.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #4 against #46.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5 for Science?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5 in Science at #34 against #47.