Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.2
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in 7 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GPT-5.2
#14 Best current rank: #14 in Math, as of Oct 14, 2026.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #74 · #74 in General LLM Margin 50.34013605442177 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #70 · #70 in Reasoning Margin 48.63013698630137 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #14 · #14 in Math Margin 28.888888888888886 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #26 · #26 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #67 · #67 in Coding › Web dev Margin 61.6822429906542 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #80 · #80 in Long context Margin 54.42176870748299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #65 · #65 in Factuality Margin 49.25373134328358 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #24 · #24 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-5.2: $4.8125 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GPT-5.2: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in General LLM at #5 against #74.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Reasoning at #4 against #70.
Math: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Math at #10 against #14.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #26 against #34.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #67.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Long context at #4 against #80.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Factuality at #12 against #65.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #24.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.2?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in 7 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.2 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in General LLM at #5 against #74.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.2 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Reasoning at #4 against #70.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.2 for Math?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.2 in Math at #10 against #14.