Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 Nano
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GPT-5.4 Nano
#43 Best recorded rank: #43 in Abstraction (ARC), as of Oct 14, 2026.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #114 · #114 in General LLM Margin 77.55102040816327 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #109 · #109 in Reasoning Margin 75.34246575342466 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #73 · #73 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Mar 17, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | — |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #120 · #120 in Long context Margin 81.63265306122449 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #98 · #98 in Factuality Margin 73.88059701492537 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #43 · #43 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Mar 17, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-5.4 Nano: $0.4625 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GPT-5.4 Nano: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in General LLM at #5 against #114.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in Reasoning at #4 against #109.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in Science at #34 against #73.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in Long context at #4 against #120.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in Factuality at #12 against #98.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #43.
Claude Opus 4.7 · GPT-5.4 Nano
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 Nano?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 Nano for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in General LLM at #5 against #114.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 Nano for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in Reasoning at #4 against #109.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.4 Nano for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.4 Nano in Science at #34 against #73.