Compare · 2026-10-14

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.5 Instant

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, and Factuality.

CategoryClaude Opus 4.7GPT-5.5 Instant
General LLM
#5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM
Margin 3.401360544217681
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#31 · #31 in General LLM
Margin 21.088435374149654
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Reasoning
#4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning
Margin 3.4246575342465775
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#33 · #33 in Reasoning
Margin 23.28767123287672
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Math
#10 · #10 in Math
Margin 20
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Science
#34 · #34 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
#65 · #65 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 5, 2026
Coding
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Coding › Web dev
#32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 28.971962616822424
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
—
Long context
#4 · Near-SOTA · Long context
Margin 2.7210884353741562
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#39 · #39 in Long context
Margin 26.530612244897952
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Vision
#20 · Was SOTA · Vision
Margin 55.26315789473684
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026
Factuality
#12 · #12 in Factuality
Margin 9.701492537313428
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#64 · #64 in Factuality
Margin 48.507462686567166
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Abstraction (ARC)
#11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026
—
Price per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.

GPT-5.5 Instant: price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.

GPT-5.5 Instant: closed weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in General LLM at #5 against #31.

Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in Reasoning at #4 against #33.

Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in Science at #34 against #65.

Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in Long context at #4 against #39.

Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in Factuality at #12 against #64.

Claude Opus 4.7 · GPT-5.5 Instant

Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5 Instant?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, and Factuality.

Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5 Instant for General LLM?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in General LLM at #5 against #31.

Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5 Instant for Reasoning?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in Reasoning at #4 against #33.

Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.5 Instant for Science?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.5 Instant in Science at #34 against #65.