Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in 5 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GPT-5.6 Terra
#4 Best recorded rank: #4 in Abstraction (ARC), as of Oct 15, 2026.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #35 · #35 in General LLM Margin 23.80952380952381 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #35 · #35 in Reasoning Margin 24.657534246575338 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #15 · #15 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 9, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #13 · #13 in Coding Margin 63.63636363636363 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | — | #13 · #13 in Coding › Agentic Margin 63.63636363636363 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #42 · #42 in Coding › Web dev Margin 38.3177570093458 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Long context Margin 31.292517006802726 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #11 · #11 in Vision Margin 31.578947368421055 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #24 · #24 in Factuality Margin 18.656716417910445 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #4 · #4 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 9, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-5.6 Terra: $4.5 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GPT-5.6 Terra: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in General LLM at #5 against #35.
Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in Reasoning at #4 against #35.
Science: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Terra leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #15 against #34.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #42.
Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in Long context at #4 against #46.
Vision: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Terra leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Vision at #11 against #20.
Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in Factuality at #12 against #24.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Terra leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Abstraction (ARC) at #4 against #11.
Claude Opus 4.7 · GPT-5.6 Terra
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in 5 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Terra for General LLM?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in General LLM at #5 against #35.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Terra for Reasoning?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.6 Terra in Reasoning at #4 against #35.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.6 Terra for Science?
As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Terra leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #15 against #34.