Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in 5 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GPT-6 Luna
Yes. Yes on Coding (best per dollar); Coding › Agentic (best per dollar). Not the overall leader.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-6 Luna |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 2.659574468085111 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #82 · #82 in General LLM Margin 43.61702127659574 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 2.659574468085111 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #76 · #76 in Reasoning Margin 40.95744680851064 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #33 · #33 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #17 · #17 in Coding Margin 81.81818181818181 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | — | #17 · #17 in Coding › Agentic Margin 81.81818181818181 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #34 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 26.400000000000006 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #31 · #31 in Coding › Web dev Margin 24 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.1276595744680833 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #75 · #75 in Long context Margin 39.89361702127659 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #17 · #17 in Vision Margin 47.36842105263158 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Factuality | #13 · #13 in Factuality Margin 8.139534883720927 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #45 · #45 in Factuality Margin 26.74418604651163 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #22 · #22 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-6 Luna: $0.19999999999999998 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GPT-6 Luna: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in General LLM at #5 against #82.
Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in Reasoning at #4 against #76.
Science: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6 Luna leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #33 against #34.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6 Luna leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #31 against #34.
Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in Long context at #4 against #75.
Vision: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6 Luna leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Vision at #17 against #20.
Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in Factuality at #13 against #45.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #22.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6 Luna?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in 5 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6 Luna for General LLM?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in General LLM at #5 against #82.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6 Luna for Reasoning?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6 Luna in Reasoning at #4 against #76.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6 Luna for Science?
As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-6 Luna leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #33 against #34.