Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3 8 27B
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in 5 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
Qwen3 8 27B
Yes. Yes on Reasoning (≤32B); Coding › Web dev (≤32B). Not the overall leader.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen3 8 27B |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #72 · #72 in General LLM Margin 48.97959183673469 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #67 · #67 in Reasoning Margin 46.57534246575342 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #24 · #24 in Coding › Web dev Margin 21.495327102803742 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #75 · #75 in Long context Margin 51.0204081632653 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #68 · #68 in Factuality Margin 51.49253731343283 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #20 · #20 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 14, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Qwen3 8 27B: $0.605 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
Qwen3 8 27B: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in General LLM at #5 against #72.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in Reasoning at #4 against #67.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Qwen3 8 27B leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #24 against #32.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in Long context at #4 against #75.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in Factuality at #12 against #68.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #20.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3 8 27B?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in 5 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3 8 27B for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in General LLM at #5 against #72.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3 8 27B for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads Qwen3 8 27B in Reasoning at #4 against #67.
Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3 8 27B for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Qwen3 8 27B leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #24 against #32.