Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.8
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #20 · #20 in General LLM Margin 13.605442176870753 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #61 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 41.49659863945578 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #10 · #10 in Reasoning Margin 7.534246575342465 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #73 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 50.68493150684932 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #27 · #27 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | #58 · #58 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding | #12 · #12 in Coding Margin 59.09090909090909 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding › Agentic | #12 · #12 in Coding › Agentic Margin 59.09090909090909 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #33 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 29.90654205607477 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #105 · #105 in Coding › Web dev Margin 97.19626168224299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #10 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 6.802721088435391 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #58 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 39.455782312925166 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #13 · #13 in Vision Margin 36.842105263157904 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #21 · #21 in Factuality Margin 16.417910447761187 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #33 · #33 in Factuality Margin 25.373134328358205 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #12 · #12 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | #48 · #48 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
Claude Opus 4.8: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.8: closed weights.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #20 against #61.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #10 against #73.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #27 against #58.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #33 against #105.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Long context at #10 against #58.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Factuality at #21 against #33.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Abstraction (ARC) at #12 against #48.
Claude Opus 4.8 · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #20 against #61.
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #10 against #73.
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #27 against #58.