Claude Opus 4.8 vs Gemma 4 31B
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.8
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
Gemma 4 31B
Yes. Yes on General LLM (≤32B); Reasoning (≤32B). Not the overall leader.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.8 | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #21 · #21 in General LLM Margin 11.170212765957444 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #67 · #67 in General LLM Margin 35.63829787234043 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #10 · #10 in Reasoning Margin 5.851063829787236 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #64 · #64 in Reasoning Margin 34.57446808510639 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #27 · #27 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | — |
| Coding | #12 · #12 in Coding Margin 59.09090909090909 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #12 · #12 in Coding › Agentic Margin 59.09090909090909 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #35 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 27.200000000000003 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #90 · #90 in Coding › Web dev Margin 71.2 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #10 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 5.319148936170208 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #53 · #53 in Long context Margin 28.191489361702125 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #13 · #13 in Vision Margin 36.842105263157904 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #24 · #24 in Factuality Margin 14.534883720930239 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #60 · #60 in Factuality Margin 35.46511627906976 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #12 · #12 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 4.8: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemma 4 31B: price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.
Claude Opus 4.8: closed weights.
Gemma 4 31B: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in General LLM at #21 against #67.
Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in Reasoning at #10 against #64.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in Coding › Web dev at #35 against #90.
Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in Long context at #10 against #53.
Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in Factuality at #24 against #60.
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemma 4 31B?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemma 4 31B for General LLM?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in General LLM at #21 against #67.
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemma 4 31B for Reasoning?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in Reasoning at #10 against #64.
Claude Opus 4.8 or Gemma 4 31B for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads Gemma 4 31B in Coding › Web dev at #35 against #90.