Claude Opus 4.8 vs GLM 4 6V
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in 4 of 4 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.8
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
GLM 4 6V
#147 Best current rank: #147 in Factuality, as of Oct 15, 2026.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.8 | GLM 4 6V |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #21 · #21 in General LLM Margin 11.170212765957444 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #178 · #178 in General LLM Margin 94.68085106382979 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #10 · #10 in Reasoning Margin 5.851063829787236 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #187 · #187 in Reasoning Margin 100 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | — |
| Science | #27 · #27 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | — |
| Coding | #12 · #12 in Coding Margin 59.09090909090909 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #12 · #12 in Coding › Agentic Margin 59.09090909090909 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #35 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 27.200000000000003 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | — |
| Long context | #10 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 5.319148936170208 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #178 · #178 in Long context Margin 94.68085106382979 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #13 · #13 in Vision Margin 36.842105263157904 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #24 · #24 in Factuality Margin 14.534883720930239 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #147 · #147 in Factuality Margin 86.04651162790698 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #12 · #12 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · May 28, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 4.8: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 4 6V: $0.44999999999999996 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.8: closed weights.
GLM 4 6V: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in General LLM at #21 against #178.
Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in Reasoning at #10 against #187.
Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in Long context at #10 against #178.
Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in Factuality at #24 against #147.
Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM 4 6V?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in 4 of 4 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM 4 6V for General LLM?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in General LLM at #21 against #178.
Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM 4 6V for Reasoning?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in Reasoning at #10 against #187.
Claude Opus 4.8 or GLM 4 6V for Long context?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Opus 4.8 leads GLM 4 6V in Long context at #10 against #178.