Compare · 2026-10-14

Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking
General LLM
#2 · Near-SOTA · General LLM
Margin 1.3605442176870781
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#89 · #89 in General LLM
Margin 60.54421768707483
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Reasoning
#1 · Co-SOTA · Reasoning
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#85 · #85 in Reasoning
Margin 58.9041095890411
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Math
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Science
#31 · #31 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026
—
Coding
#1 · Co-SOTA · Coding
Margin 0
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Coding › Agentic
#1 · Co-SOTA · Coding › Agentic
Margin 0
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
—
Coding › Web dev
#1 · SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#81 · #81 in Coding › Web dev
Margin 74.76635514018692
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Long context
#1 · Co-SOTA · Long context
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#79 · #79 in Long context
Margin 53.74149659863946
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Vision
#4 · Near-SOTA · Vision
Margin 13.15789473684211
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026
—
Factuality
#1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#79 · #79 in Factuality
Margin 59.70149253731344
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Abstraction (ARC)
#1 · #1 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026
—
Price per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5.5: $8.000000000000002 per 1M blended tokens.

DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking: price per 1M tokens is unset in the catalog.

Open weights

Claude Opus 5.5: closed weights.

DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking: open weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in General LLM at #2 against #89.

Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in Reasoning at #1 against #85.

Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in Coding › Web dev at #1 against #81.

Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in Long context at #1 against #79.

Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in Factuality at #1 against #79.

Claude Opus 5.5 · DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking

Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.

Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking for General LLM?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in General LLM at #2 against #89.

Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking for Reasoning?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in Reasoning at #1 against #85.

Claude Opus 5.5 or DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking for Coding › Web dev?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads DeepSeek V3.2 Thinking in Coding › Web dev at #1 against #81.