Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 4.7
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 5.5
Yes. SOTA in co-SOTA in Reasoning, co-SOTA in Coding, co-SOTA in Coding › Agentic, Coding › Web dev, co-SOTA in Long context and co-SOTA in Factuality.
GLM 4.7
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Claude Opus 5.5 | GLM 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #2 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 1.3605442176870781 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #68 · #68 in General LLM Margin 46.25850340136054 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #1 · Co-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #66 · #66 in Reasoning Margin 45.89041095890411 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #31 · #31 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 | #64 · #64 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 22, 2025 |
| Coding | #1 · Co-SOTA · Coding Margin 0 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #1 · Co-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 0 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #1 · SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #63 · #63 in Coding › Web dev Margin 57.94392523364486 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #1 · Co-SOTA · Long context Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #66 · #66 in Long context Margin 44.89795918367347 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #4 · Near-SOTA · Vision Margin 13.15789473684211 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #62 · #62 in Factuality Margin 47.014925373134325 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #1 · #1 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 5.5: $8.000000000000002 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 4.7: $1 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 5.5: closed weights.
GLM 4.7: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in General LLM at #2 against #68.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in Reasoning at #1 against #66.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in Science at #31 against #64.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #1 against #63.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in Long context at #1 against #66.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in Factuality at #1 against #62.
Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 4.7?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 4.7 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in General LLM at #2 against #68.
Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 4.7 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in Reasoning at #1 against #66.
Claude Opus 5.5 or GLM 4.7 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GLM 4.7 in Science at #31 against #64.