Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 5
Close. Near-SOTA in Factuality, rank #4.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
| Category | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #11 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 7.482993197278915 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #61 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 41.49659863945578 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #9 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 6.849315068493155 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #73 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 50.68493150684932 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #12 · #12 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | #58 · #58 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding | #4 · #4 in Coding Margin 22.727272727272734 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding › Agentic | #4 · #4 in Coding › Agentic Margin 22.727272727272734 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #6 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 4.672897196261687 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #105 · #105 in Coding › Web dev Margin 97.19626168224299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #9 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 6.122448979591837 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #58 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 39.455782312925166 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #12 · #12 in Vision Margin 36.8421052631579 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #4 · Near-SOTA · Factuality Margin 3.731343283582092 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #33 · #33 in Factuality Margin 25.373134328358205 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | #48 · #48 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
Claude Opus 5: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 5: closed weights.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #11 against #61.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #9 against #73.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #12 against #58.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #6 against #105.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Long context at #9 against #58.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Factuality at #4 against #33.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Abstraction (ARC) at #3 against #48.
Claude Opus 5 · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #11 against #61.
Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #9 against #73.
Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #12 against #58.