Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 4.6
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 5
Close. Near-SOTA in Factuality, rank #4.
GLM 4.6
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
| Category | Claude Opus 5 | GLM 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #11 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 7.482993197278915 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #87 · #87 in General LLM Margin 59.183673469387756 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #9 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 6.849315068493155 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #89 · #89 in Reasoning Margin 61.64383561643836 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #12 · #12 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | — |
| Coding | #4 · #4 in Coding Margin 22.727272727272734 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #4 · #4 in Coding › Agentic Margin 22.727272727272734 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #6 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 4.672897196261687 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #88 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 81.30841121495327 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #9 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 6.122448979591837 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #90 · #90 in Long context Margin 61.224489795918366 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #12 · #12 in Vision Margin 36.8421052631579 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #4 · Near-SOTA · Factuality Margin 3.731343283582092 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #55 · #55 in Factuality Margin 41.7910447761194 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 5: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 4.6: $0.875 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 5: closed weights.
GLM 4.6: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in General LLM at #11 against #87.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in Reasoning at #9 against #89.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in Coding › Web dev at #6 against #88.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in Long context at #9 against #90.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in Factuality at #4 against #55.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.6?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in 5 of 5 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.6 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in General LLM at #11 against #87.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.6 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in Reasoning at #9 against #89.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.6 for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.6 in Coding › Web dev at #6 against #88.