Compare · 2026-10-14

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-6.1 Sol

As of Oct 14, 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 0 of 6 shared categories.

CategoryDeepSeek V4 ProGPT-6.1 Sol
General LLM
#44 · #44 in General LLM
Margin 29.931972789115648
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#18 · #18 in General LLM
Margin 12.244897959183675
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Reasoning
#45 · #45 in Reasoning
Margin 31.506849315068493
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#15 · #15 in Reasoning
Margin 10.958904109589042
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Math
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Science
#28 · #28 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 24, 2026
#4 · #4 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026
Coding
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 24, 2026
#2 · Near-SOTA · Coding
Margin 13.63636363636364
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
Coding › Agentic—
#2 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic
Margin 13.63636363636364
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
Coding › Web dev
#57 · #57 in Coding › Web dev
Margin 52.33644859813084
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#4 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 2.803738317757009
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Long context
#43 · #43 in Long context
Margin 29.25170068027211
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#17 · #17 in Long context
Margin 11.564625850340136
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Vision—
#1 · Co-SOTA · Vision
Margin 0
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026
Factuality
#41 · #41 in Factuality
Margin 31.343283582089555
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#29 · #29 in Factuality
Margin 22.388059701492537
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Abstraction (ARC)—
#1 · #1 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026
Price per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.48371999999999993 per 1M blended tokens.

GPT-6.1 Sol: $4.000000000000001 per 1M blended tokens.

Open weights

DeepSeek V4 Pro: open weights.

GPT-6.1 Sol: closed weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in General LLM at #18 against #44.

Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Reasoning at #15 against #45.

Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Science at #4 against #28.

Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #4 against #57.

Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Long context at #17 against #43.

Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Factuality at #29 against #41.

DeepSeek V4 Pro · GPT-6.1 Sol

DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol?

As of Oct 14, 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 0 of 6 shared categories.

DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol for General LLM?

As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in General LLM at #18 against #44.

DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol for Reasoning?

As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Reasoning at #15 against #45.

DeepSeek V4 Pro or GPT-6.1 Sol for Science?

As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads DeepSeek V4 Pro in Science at #4 against #28.