Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.5
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads GPT-5.5 in 0 of 7 shared categories.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
GPT-5.5
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #61 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 41.49659863945578 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #21 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 14.285714285714292 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #73 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 50.68493150684932 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #25 · #25 in Reasoning Margin 17.808219178082197 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #58 · #58 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 | #30 · #30 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 23, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #105 · #105 in Coding › Web dev Margin 97.19626168224299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #44 · #44 in Coding › Web dev Margin 40.18691588785047 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #58 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 39.455782312925166 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #23 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 15.646258503401356 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 | #10 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 28.94736842105263 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 23, 2026 |
| Factuality | #33 · #33 in Factuality Margin 25.373134328358205 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #5 · Was SOTA · Factuality Margin 4.477611940298502 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #48 · #48 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 | #7 · #7 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 23, 2026 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-5.5: $11.25 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: closed weights.
GPT-5.5: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #21 against #61.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #25 against #73.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #30 against #58.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #44 against #105.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Long context at #23 against #58.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Factuality at #5 against #33.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Abstraction (ARC) at #7 against #48.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.5?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads GPT-5.5 in 0 of 7 shared categories.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.5 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #21 against #61.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.5 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #25 against #73.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.5 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-5.5 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #30 against #58.