Gemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.6 Sol
As of Oct 15, 2026, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads GPT-5.6 Sol in 0 of 7 shared categories.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
GPT-5.6 Sol
Close. Near-SOTA in Vision, rank #3.
| Category | Gemini 2.5 Pro | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #61 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 41.49659863945578 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #17 · #17 in General LLM Margin 11.564625850340136 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #73 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 50.68493150684932 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #12 · #12 in Reasoning Margin 8.904109589041099 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #58 · #58 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 | #13 · #13 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 9, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #9 · #9 in Coding Margin 45.45454545454545 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | — | #9 · #9 in Coding › Agentic Margin 45.45454545454545 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #105 · #105 in Coding › Web dev Margin 97.19626168224299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #21 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 18.691588785046733 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #58 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 39.455782312925166 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #13 · #13 in Long context Margin 8.84353741496598 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 | #3 · Near-SOTA · Vision Margin 10.526315789473685 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #33 · #33 in Factuality Margin 25.373134328358205 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #14 · #14 in Factuality Margin 11.194029850746276 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #48 · #48 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 9, 2026 |
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-5.6 Sol: $8.000000000000002 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: closed weights.
GPT-5.6 Sol: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #17 against #61.
Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #12 against #73.
Science: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #13 against #58.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #21 against #105.
Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Long context at #13 against #58.
Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Factuality at #14 against #33.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Abstraction (ARC) at #3 against #48.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.6 Sol?
As of Oct 15, 2026, Gemini 2.5 Pro leads GPT-5.6 Sol in 0 of 7 shared categories.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.6 Sol for General LLM?
As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #17 against #61.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.6 Sol for Reasoning?
As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #12 against #73.
Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-5.6 Sol for Science?
As of Oct 15, 2026, GPT-5.6 Sol leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Science at #13 against #58.