Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Yes. Yes on Math (best per dollar). Not the overall leader.
GLM 5
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #15 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 10.204081632653057 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #45 · #45 in General LLM Margin 30.612244897959187 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #14 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 10.273972602739732 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Reasoning Margin 32.1917808219178 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #3 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 4.444444444444443 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #7 · #7 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #58 · #58 in Coding › Web dev Margin 53.271028037383175 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #62 · #62 in Coding › Web dev Margin 57.00934579439252 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #12 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 8.163265306122454 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Long context Margin 31.972789115646265 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #25 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 68.42105263157896 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #18 · #18 in Factuality Margin 14.179104477611943 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Factuality Margin 35.07462686567165 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #2 · #2 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: $4.5 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5: $0.9299999999999999 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: closed weights.
GLM 5: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #15 against #45.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #14 against #46.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Science at #7 against #47.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Coding › Web dev at #58 against #62.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Long context at #12 against #47.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Factuality at #18 against #46.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Abstraction (ARC) at #2 against #47.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · GLM 5
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #15 against #45.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #14 against #46.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5 in Science at #7 against #47.