Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GLM 5.2
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in 6 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Yes. Yes on Math (best per dollar). Not the overall leader.
GLM 5.2
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #15 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 10.204081632653057 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #26 · #26 in General LLM Margin 17.687074829931973 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #14 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 10.273972602739732 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #30 · #30 in Reasoning Margin 21.23287671232876 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #3 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 4.444444444444443 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #7 · #7 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #23 · #23 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 16, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #58 · #58 in Coding › Web dev Margin 53.271028037383175 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #23 · #23 in Coding › Web dev Margin 20.560747663551396 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #12 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 8.163265306122454 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #25 · #25 in Long context Margin 17.006802721088434 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #25 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 68.42105263157896 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #18 · #18 in Factuality Margin 14.179104477611943 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #31 · #31 in Factuality Margin 23.88059701492537 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #2 · #2 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #29 · #29 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 16, 2026 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: $4.5 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5.2: $1.7799999999999998 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: closed weights.
GLM 5.2: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in General LLM at #15 against #26.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in Reasoning at #14 against #30.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in Science at #7 against #23.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in Coding › Web dev at #23 against #58.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in Long context at #12 against #25.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in Factuality at #18 against #31.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in Abstraction (ARC) at #2 against #29.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · GLM 5.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5.2?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in 6 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5.2 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in General LLM at #15 against #26.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5.2 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in Reasoning at #14 against #30.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GLM 5.2 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GLM 5.2 in Science at #7 against #23.