Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-4.1
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Science, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Yes. Yes on Math (best per dollar). Not the overall leader.
GPT-4.1
It used to be. Was SOTA in Long context.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #15 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 10.204081632653057 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #101 · #101 in General LLM Margin 68.70748299319727 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #14 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 10.273972602739732 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #102 · #102 in Reasoning Margin 70.54794520547945 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #3 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 4.444444444444443 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #39 · #39 in Math Margin 86.66666666666667 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 14, 2025 |
| Science | #7 · #7 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #96 · #96 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 14, 2025 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 14, 2025 |
| Coding › Web dev | #58 · #58 in Coding › Web dev Margin 53.271028037383175 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | — |
| Long context | #12 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 8.163265306122454 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #95 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 64.62585034013605 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #25 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 68.42105263157896 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #18 · #18 in Factuality Margin 14.179104477611943 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #103 · #103 in Factuality Margin 77.61194029850746 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #2 · #2 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #85 · #85 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 14, 2025 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: $4.5 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-4.1: $3.5 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: closed weights.
GPT-4.1: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in General LLM at #15 against #101.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Reasoning at #14 against #102.
Math: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Math at #3 against #39.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Science at #7 against #96.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Long context at #12 against #95.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Factuality at #18 against #103.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Abstraction (ARC) at #2 against #85.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · GPT-4.1
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4.1?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Science, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4.1 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in General LLM at #15 against #101.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4.1 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Reasoning at #14 against #102.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-4.1 for Math?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-4.1 in Math at #3 against #39.