Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.2
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in 8 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Yes. Yes on Math (best per dollar). Not the overall leader.
GPT-5.2
#14 Best current rank: #14 in Math, as of Oct 14, 2026.
| Category | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #15 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 10.204081632653057 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #74 · #74 in General LLM Margin 50.34013605442177 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #14 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 10.273972602739732 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #70 · #70 in Reasoning Margin 48.63013698630137 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #3 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 4.444444444444443 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #14 · #14 in Math Margin 28.888888888888886 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
| Science | #7 · #7 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #26 · #26 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
| Coding › Web dev | #58 · #58 in Coding › Web dev Margin 53.271028037383175 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #67 · #67 in Coding › Web dev Margin 61.6822429906542 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #12 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 8.163265306122454 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #80 · #80 in Long context Margin 54.42176870748299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #25 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 68.42105263157896 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #18 · #18 in Factuality Margin 14.179104477611943 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #65 · #65 in Factuality Margin 49.25373134328358 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #2 · #2 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 19, 2026 | #24 · #24 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 11, 2025 |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: $4.5 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-5.2: $4.8125 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: closed weights.
GPT-5.2: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in General LLM at #15 against #74.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Reasoning at #14 against #70.
Math: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Math at #3 against #14.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Science at #7 against #26.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Coding › Web dev at #58 against #67.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Long context at #12 against #80.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Factuality at #18 against #65.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Abstraction (ARC) at #2 against #24.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview · GPT-5.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.2?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in 8 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.2 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in General LLM at #15 against #74.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.2 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Reasoning at #14 against #70.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or GPT-5.2 for Math?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads GPT-5.2 in Math at #3 against #14.