Compare · 2026-10-14

GLM 5.1 vs GPT-4 Turbo

As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.1 leads GPT-4 Turbo in 1 of 2 shared categories: Science.

CategoryGLM 5.1GPT-4 Turbo
General LLM
#37 · #37 in General LLM
Margin 25.17006802721089
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#10 · #10 in General LLM
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 23, 2024
Reasoning
#36 · #36 in Reasoning
Margin 25.342465753424662
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Sep 4, 2024
Math
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
—
Science
#35 · #35 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 7, 2026
#139 · #139 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 9, 2024
Coding
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 7, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Sep 15, 2024
Coding › Web dev
#46 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 42.05607476635514
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
—
Long context
#36 · Was SOTA · Long context
Margin 24.48979591836735
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
—
Vision—
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026
Factuality
#38 · #38 in Factuality
Margin 29.104477611940297
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
—
Price per 1M tokens

GLM 5.1: $2.0425 per 1M blended tokens.

GPT-4 Turbo: $15.000000000000002 per 1M blended tokens.

Open weights

GLM 5.1: open weights.

GPT-4 Turbo: closed weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-4 Turbo leads GLM 5.1 in General LLM at #10 against #37.

Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.1 leads GPT-4 Turbo in Science at #35 against #139.

GLM 5.1 · GPT-4 Turbo

GLM 5.1 or GPT-4 Turbo?

As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.1 leads GPT-4 Turbo in 1 of 2 shared categories: Science.

GLM 5.1 or GPT-4 Turbo for General LLM?

As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-4 Turbo leads GLM 5.1 in General LLM at #10 against #37.

GLM 5.1 or GPT-4 Turbo for Science?

As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.1 leads GPT-4 Turbo in Science at #35 against #139.