Sign in
Compare · 2026-10-15

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5

As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in 8 of 9 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding, Coding › Agentic, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Vision, and Factuality.

CategoryClaude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5
General LLM
#6 · Near-SOTA · General LLM
Margin 3.191489361702125
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#11 · Was SOTA · General LLM
Margin 5.851063829787236
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Reasoning
#5 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning
Margin 3.191489361702125
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#9 · Was SOTA · Reasoning
Margin 5.319148936170208
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Math
#2 · Near-SOTA · Math
Margin 2.2222222222222285
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Science—
#12 · #12 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026
Coding
#3 · Near-SOTA · Coding
Margin 18.181818181818187
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
#4 · #4 in Coding
Margin 22.727272727272734
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
Coding › Agentic
#3 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic
Margin 18.181818181818187
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
#4 · #4 in Coding › Agentic
Margin 22.727272727272734
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
Coding › Web dev
#5 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 3.200000000000003
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#6 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 4
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Long context
#6 · Near-SOTA · Long context
Margin 3.1914893617021107
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#9 · Was SOTA · Long context
Margin 4.7872340425531945
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Vision
#6 · #6 in Vision
Margin 18.421052631578945
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026
#12 · #12 in Vision
Margin 36.8421052631579
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026
Factuality
#1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#4 · Near-SOTA · Factuality
Margin 2.9069767441860535
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Abstraction (ARC)
#3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026
#3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026
Price per 1M tokens

Claude Fable 5.1: $20 per 1M blended tokens.

Claude Opus 5: $10 per 1M blended tokens.

Open weights

Claude Fable 5.1: closed weights.

Claude Opus 5: closed weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in General LLM at #6 against #11.

Reasoning: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Reasoning at #5 against #9.

Coding: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Coding at #3 against #4.

Coding › Agentic: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Coding › Agentic at #3 against #4.

Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #6.

Long context: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Long context at #6 against #9.

Vision: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Vision at #6 against #12.

Factuality: As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Factuality at #1 against #4.

Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5 share #3 in Abstraction (ARC).

Claude Fable 5.1 · Claude Opus 5

Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5?

As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in 8 of 9 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding, Coding › Agentic, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Vision, and Factuality.

Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5 for General LLM?

As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in General LLM at #6 against #11.

Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5 for Reasoning?

As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Reasoning at #5 against #9.

Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5 for Coding?

As of Oct 15, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Claude Opus 5 in Coding at #3 against #4.