Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Fable 5.1
Yes. SOTA in co-SOTA in Factuality.
Gemini 2.5 Pro
It used to be. Was SOTA in General LLM.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #6 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 4.08163265306122 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #61 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 41.49659863945578 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #5 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 4.109589041095887 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #73 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 50.68493150684932 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #2 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 2.2222222222222285 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | — | #58 · #58 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
| Coding › Agentic | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #5 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 3.738317757009341 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #105 · #105 in Coding › Web dev Margin 97.19626168224299 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #6 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 4.08163265306122 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #58 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 39.455782312925166 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #6 · #6 in Vision Margin 18.421052631578945 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #33 · #33 in Factuality Margin 25.373134328358205 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | #48 · #48 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 17, 2025 |
Claude Fable 5.1: $20 per 1M blended tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Fable 5.1: closed weights.
Gemini 2.5 Pro: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #6 against #61.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #5 against #73.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #105.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Long context at #6 against #58.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Factuality at #1 against #33.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Abstraction (ARC) at #3 against #48.
Claude Fable 5.1 · Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in General LLM at #6 against #61.
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Reasoning at #5 against #73.
Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads Gemini 2.5 Pro in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #105.