Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Fable 5.1
Yes. SOTA in co-SOTA in Factuality.
GLM 5
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #6 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 4.08163265306122 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #45 · #45 in General LLM Margin 30.612244897959187 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #5 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 4.109589041095887 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Reasoning Margin 32.1917808219178 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #2 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 2.2222222222222285 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | — | #47 · #47 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
| Coding | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #5 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 3.738317757009341 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #62 · #62 in Coding › Web dev Margin 57.00934579439252 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #6 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 4.08163265306122 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Long context Margin 31.972789115646265 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #6 · #6 in Vision Margin 18.421052631578945 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #46 · #46 in Factuality Margin 35.07462686567165 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | #47 · #47 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Feb 11, 2026 |
Claude Fable 5.1: $20 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5: $0.9299999999999999 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Fable 5.1: closed weights.
GLM 5: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #6 against #45.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #5 against #46.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #62.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in Long context at #6 against #47.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in Factuality at #1 against #46.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in Abstraction (ARC) at #3 against #47.
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in General LLM at #6 against #45.
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in Reasoning at #5 against #46.
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5 for Coding › Web dev?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5 in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #62.