Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding, Coding › Agentic, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Fable 5.1
Yes. SOTA in co-SOTA in Factuality.
GLM 5.3
Yes. Yes on General LLM (open weights); Reasoning (best per dollar). Not the overall leader.
| Category | Claude Fable 5.1 | GLM 5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #6 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 4.08163265306122 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #23 · #23 in General LLM Margin 15.646258503401356 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #5 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 4.109589041095887 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #19 · #19 in Reasoning Margin 13.698630136986296 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #2 · Near-SOTA · Math Margin 2.2222222222222285 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | — | #28 · #28 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Aug 14, 2026 |
| Coding | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #7 · #7 in Coding Margin 36.36363636363637 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #3 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 18.181818181818187 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #7 · #7 in Coding › Agentic Margin 36.36363636363637 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #5 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 3.738317757009341 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #18 · #18 in Coding › Web dev Margin 15.887850467289724 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #6 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 4.08163265306122 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #27 · #27 in Long context Margin 18.367346938775512 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #6 · #6 in Vision Margin 18.421052631578945 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality Margin 0 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #27 · #27 in Factuality Margin 20.895522388059703 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 1, 2026 | — |
Claude Fable 5.1: $20 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5.3: $1.2592499999999998 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Fable 5.1: closed weights.
GLM 5.3: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in General LLM at #6 against #23.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Reasoning at #5 against #19.
Coding: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Coding at #3 against #7.
Coding › Agentic: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Coding › Agentic at #3 against #7.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Coding › Web dev at #5 against #18.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Long context at #6 against #27.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Factuality at #1 against #27.
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5.3?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Coding, Coding › Agentic, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5.3 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in General LLM at #6 against #23.
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5.3 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Reasoning at #5 against #19.
Claude Fable 5.1 or GLM 5.3 for Coding?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Fable 5.1 leads GLM 5.3 in Coding at #3 against #7.