Claude Opus 4.7 vs GLM 5.2
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in 5 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GLM 5.2
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GLM 5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #26 · #26 in General LLM Margin 17.687074829931973 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #30 · #30 in Reasoning Margin 21.23287671232876 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #23 · #23 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 16, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #23 · #23 in Coding › Web dev Margin 20.560747663551396 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #25 · #25 in Long context Margin 17.006802721088434 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #31 · #31 in Factuality Margin 23.88059701492537 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #29 · #29 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jun 16, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 5.2: $1.7799999999999998 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GLM 5.2: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in General LLM at #5 against #26.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Reasoning at #4 against #30.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #23 against #34.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #23 against #32.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Long context at #4 against #25.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Factuality at #12 against #31.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #29.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5.2?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in 5 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5.2 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in General LLM at #5 against #26.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5.2 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GLM 5.2 in Reasoning at #4 against #30.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GLM 5.2 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GLM 5.2 leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #23 against #34.