Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.1
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in 8 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7
Close. Near-SOTA in Reasoning, rank #4.
GPT-5.1
#18 Best current rank: #18 in Math, as of Oct 14, 2026.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #47 · #47 in General LLM Margin 31.972789115646265 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #48 · #48 in Reasoning Margin 33.56164383561644 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #18 · #18 in Math Margin 37.77777777777778 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #48 · #48 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #75 · #75 in Coding › Web dev Margin 69.1588785046729 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #54 · #54 in Long context Margin 36.73469387755103 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #37 · #37 in Factuality Margin 28.358208955223887 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #31 · #31 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-5.1: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GPT-5.1: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in General LLM at #5 against #47.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Reasoning at #4 against #48.
Math: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Math at #10 against #18.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Science at #34 against #48.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Coding › Web dev at #32 against #75.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Long context at #4 against #54.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Factuality at #12 against #37.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Abstraction (ARC) at #11 against #31.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.1?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in 8 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Math, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.1 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in General LLM at #5 against #47.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.1 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Reasoning at #4 against #48.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-5.1 for Math?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-5.1 in Math at #10 against #18.