Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 4 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, and Factuality.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #5 · Near-SOTA · General LLM Margin 3.401360544217681 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #18 · #18 in General LLM Margin 12.244897959183675 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #4 · Near-SOTA · Reasoning Margin 3.4246575342465775 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #15 · #15 in Reasoning Margin 10.958904109589042 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #10 · #10 in Math Margin 20 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #34 · #34 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #4 · #4 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
| Coding | #— · Not enough data Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #2 · Near-SOTA · Coding Margin 13.63636363636364 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | — | #2 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Agentic Margin 13.63636363636364 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 |
| Coding › Web dev | #32 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 28.971962616822424 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #4 · Near-SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 2.803738317757009 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #4 · Near-SOTA · Long context Margin 2.7210884353741562 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #17 · #17 in Long context Margin 11.564625850340136 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #20 · Was SOTA · Vision Margin 55.26315789473684 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #1 · Co-SOTA · Vision Margin 0 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
| Factuality | #12 · #12 in Factuality Margin 9.701492537313428 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #29 · #29 in Factuality Margin 22.388059701492537 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #11 · #11 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Apr 16, 2026 | #1 · #1 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 29, 2026 |
Claude Opus 4.7: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GPT-6.1 Sol: $4.000000000000001 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 4.7: closed weights.
GPT-6.1 Sol: closed weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in General LLM at #5 against #18.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in Reasoning at #4 against #15.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #4 against #34.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #4 against #32.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in Long context at #4 against #17.
Vision: As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Vision at #1 against #20.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in Factuality at #12 against #29.
Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Abstraction (ARC) at #1 against #11.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6.1 Sol?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in 4 of 8 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6.1 Sol for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in General LLM at #5 against #18.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6.1 Sol for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 4.7 leads GPT-6.1 Sol in Reasoning at #4 against #15.
Claude Opus 4.7 or GPT-6.1 Sol for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol leads Claude Opus 4.7 in Science at #4 against #34.