Compare · 2026-10-14

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.1

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).

CategoryClaude Opus 5.5GPT-5.1
General LLM
#2 · Near-SOTA · General LLM
Margin 1.3605442176870781
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#47 · #47 in General LLM
Margin 31.972789115646265
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Reasoning
#1 · Co-SOTA · Reasoning
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#48 · #48 in Reasoning
Margin 33.56164383561644
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Math
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#18 · #18 in Math
Margin 37.77777777777778
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025
Science
#31 · #31 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026
#48 · #48 in Science
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025
Coding
#1 · Co-SOTA · Coding
Margin 0
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025
Coding › Agentic
#1 · Co-SOTA · Coding › Agentic
Margin 0
Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026
—
Coding › Web dev
#1 · SOTA · Coding › Web dev
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#75 · #75 in Coding › Web dev
Margin 69.1588785046729
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Long context
#1 · Co-SOTA · Long context
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#54 · #54 in Long context
Margin 36.73469387755103
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Vision
#4 · Near-SOTA · Vision
Margin 13.15789473684211
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026
#— · Not enough data
Margin —
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 9, 2026
Factuality
#1 · Co-SOTA · Factuality
Margin 0
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
#37 · #37 in Factuality
Margin 28.358208955223887
LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026
Abstraction (ARC)
#1 · #1 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Sep 22, 2026
#31 · #31 in Abstraction (ARC)
Margin —
Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Nov 13, 2025
Price per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5.5: $8.000000000000002 per 1M blended tokens.

GPT-5.1: $3.4375000000000004 per 1M blended tokens.

Open weights

Claude Opus 5.5: closed weights.

GPT-5.1: closed weights.

Which to pick

General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in General LLM at #2 against #47.

Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Reasoning at #1 against #48.

Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Science at #31 against #48.

Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Coding › Web dev at #1 against #75.

Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Long context at #1 against #54.

Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Factuality at #1 against #37.

Abstraction (ARC): As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Abstraction (ARC) at #1 against #31.

Claude Opus 5.5 · GPT-5.1

Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.1?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in 7 of 7 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, Factuality, and Abstraction (ARC).

Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.1 for General LLM?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in General LLM at #2 against #47.

Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.1 for Reasoning?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Reasoning at #1 against #48.

Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-5.1 for Science?

As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 leads GPT-5.1 in Science at #31 against #48.