Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 4.7
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 5
Close. Near-SOTA in Factuality, rank #4.
GLM 4.7
It used to be. Was SOTA in Coding › Web dev.
| Category | Claude Opus 5 | GLM 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| General LLM | #11 · Was SOTA · General LLM Margin 7.482993197278915 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #68 · #68 in General LLM Margin 46.25850340136054 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Reasoning | #9 · Was SOTA · Reasoning Margin 6.849315068493155 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #66 · #66 in Reasoning Margin 45.89041095890411 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Math | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Science | #12 · #12 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | #64 · #64 in Science Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Dec 22, 2025 |
| Coding | #4 · #4 in Coding Margin 22.727272727272734 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | #— · Not enough data Margin — LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Coding › Agentic | #4 · #4 in Coding › Agentic Margin 22.727272727272734 Terminal-Bench Harbor Hub · Oct 6, 2026 | — |
| Coding › Web dev | #6 · Was SOTA · Coding › Web dev Margin 4.672897196261687 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #63 · #63 in Coding › Web dev Margin 57.94392523364486 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Long context | #9 · Was SOTA · Long context Margin 6.122448979591837 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #66 · #66 in Long context Margin 44.89795918367347 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Vision | #12 · #12 in Vision Margin 36.8421052631579 Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | — |
| Factuality | #4 · Near-SOTA · Factuality Margin 3.731343283582092 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 | #62 · #62 in Factuality Margin 47.014925373134325 LMArena leaderboard dataset · Oct 13, 2026 |
| Abstraction (ARC) | #3 · #3 in Abstraction (ARC) Margin — Epoch AI benchmarking hub · Jul 24, 2026 | — |
Claude Opus 5: $10 per 1M blended tokens.
GLM 4.7: $1 per 1M blended tokens.
Claude Opus 5: closed weights.
GLM 4.7: open weights.
General LLM: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in General LLM at #11 against #68.
Reasoning: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in Reasoning at #9 against #66.
Science: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in Science at #12 against #64.
Coding › Web dev: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in Coding › Web dev at #6 against #63.
Long context: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in Long context at #9 against #66.
Factuality: As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in Factuality at #4 against #62.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.7?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in 6 of 6 shared categories: General LLM, Reasoning, Science, Coding › Web dev, Long context, and Factuality.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.7 for General LLM?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in General LLM at #11 against #68.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.7 for Reasoning?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in Reasoning at #9 against #66.
Claude Opus 5 or GLM 4.7 for Science?
As of Oct 14, 2026, Claude Opus 5 leads GLM 4.7 in Science at #12 against #64.